View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001616 | Composr | catalogues | public | 2014-03-25 23:24 | 2017-05-04 10:26 |
| Reporter | Chris Graham | Assigned To | Chris Graham | ||
| Severity | Feature-request | ||||
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | |||||
| Fixed in Version | |||||
| Summary | 0001616: Catalogues with "no" category | ||||
| Description | Currently you have to have a tree catalogue, or one with flat categories. Have a third option where there's only ever one category, and it's presence is hidden, so it seems as if entries are directly underneath the catalogue. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Time estimation (hours) | 5 | ||||
| Sponsorship open | |||||
|
|
Or possibly do it automatically: when a catalogue only has a single category make some changes to how things are displayed: - The breadcrumbs would skip going back to the catalogue's index screen - The add entry form would hide the category field Probably this would halve the implementation time and be a bit cleaner. |
|
|
Note that you can workaround breadcrumbs issues already using the breadcrumb XML feature, but it's highly complex. |
|
|
I've done a quick tweak for this. If there's only one category in a catalogue, the category selector is not displayed and it will default. If you use a tree catalogue then it already will skip the index in the breadcrumbs. So that works. You can also use a tree with multiple categories, but enable "narrow in", and remove the category browsing from the template. This way you have invisible categorisation, which is nice. |
|
|
This sounds great, thank you. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-04 00:17 | Chris Graham | Note Added: 0005057 | |
| 2017-05-04 00:17 | Chris Graham | Status | non-assigned => resolved |
| 2017-05-04 00:17 | Chris Graham | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2017-05-04 00:17 | Chris Graham | Assigned To | => Chris Graham |
| 2017-05-04 10:26 | Adam Edington | Note Added: 0005060 |
