View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0005979 | Composr | [All Projects] General / Uncategorised | public | 2024-10-03 15:16 | 2024-10-03 15:21 |
| Reporter | Adam Edington | Assigned To | |||
| Severity | Feature-request | ||||
| Status | non-assigned | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | |||||
| Fixed in Version | |||||
| Summary | 0005979: Sorting CATALOGUE_ENTRY_BACKREFS results | ||||
| Description | The results as listed on the referenced catalogue entry don't seem to match the chosen sort method for the catalogue with the reference. It seems quite random from my dabbling. Is there a clever way to accomplish this? | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | I have changed the add date/time for 3 entries, as I assumed it would be using this as the default but the results from this Symbol are not in any logical order. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Time estimation (hours) | |||||
| Sponsorship open | |||||
|
|
This might be related to a bug where any templates using the main_multi_content block have partially broken sorting. I'm currently unsure how to fix it and hoping Chris can lend me a hand. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-03 15:16 | Adam Edington | New Issue | |
| 2024-10-03 15:17 | Adam Edington | Description Updated | View Revisions |
| 2024-10-03 15:21 | Adam Edington | Steps to Reproduce Updated | View Revisions |
| 2024-10-03 15:21 | Patrick Schmalstig | Note Added: 0009430 |
