View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0003249Composrcataloguespublic2017-04-26 00:01
ReporterAdam EdingtonAssigned ToChris Graham 
SeverityFeature-request 
Status closedResolutionno change required 
Product Version 
Fixed in Version 
Summary0003249: Sort by name (ascending)
DescriptionShouldn't this be like:-
Sentinel
Judge Raziel

TagsNo tags attached.
Time estimation (hours)
Sponsorship open

Relationships

related to 0003252 non-assigned The terms 'ascending' and 'descending' are not user-friendly 

Activities

Adam Edington

2017-04-25 01:18

administrator  

ascending.png (7,336 bytes)
ascending.png (7,336 bytes)

Chris Graham

2017-04-25 11:20

administrator   ~0005021

Ascending means A-Z.

I wonder if you are either saying "Judge" should be skipped because it's a title. If so, that's too specific, we're not going to know the word Judge specifically.

Or you may be thinking it should know they are in a "Forename Surname" format and it should sort by Surname. However there's no system for this, and you could just use separate fields.

Adam Edington

2017-04-25 23:22

administrator   ~0005022

I always believed ascending meant bottom to top (so like Z-A) and descending meant top to bottom (A-Z). Maybe it's different in code.

Chris Graham

2017-04-25 23:24

administrator   ~0005023

Haha, I see what you mean (ascending a mountain), but no you're mistaken here.

http://www.mathsteacher.com.au/year7/ch02_power/06_asc/asc.htm

I'll add a new issue, given that it's confusing. I doubt it'll get handled anytime soon though.

Adam Edington

2017-04-25 23:29

administrator   ~0005024

I was thinking alphabetically not numerically, but yeah I suck at maths so thanks for the lesson.

Chris Graham

2017-04-25 23:30

administrator   ~0005025

It's using the term in the same way (i.e. lowerer end toward upper end), regardless of data type.

Adam Edington

2017-04-25 23:40

administrator   ~0005026

Wouldn't different terms lead to the same issue (ie, up and down) if the order is still the opposite of what you would expect from alphabetic sorting? Maybe standard catalogues should use alphabetic ordering and I assume the numeric stuff is for the ecommerce ones so maybe sort that numerically by default. I think changing the terms wouldn't solve the issue, but then again I don't understand it fully from a coding point of view.

Chris Graham

2017-04-25 23:43

administrator   ~0005027

Read how I specified the other issue. I didn't say "up" or "down".

Adam Edington

2017-04-25 23:52

administrator   ~0005028

No I was saying up and down as an example of different terms for ascending and descending. Changing the terms doesn't solve the confusing if the ordering is the same. Anyhow, it's not the biggest issue in the world so I shall let you get on with the more important stuff :)

Chris Graham

2017-04-25 23:56

administrator   ~0005029

Yeah, my issue talks about changing it to natural language like 'alphabetical'. So we wouldn't be switched out ascending/descending to some other terms, we'd be introducing per-data-type terms that read much more naturally.

Adam Edington

2017-04-26 00:01

administrator   ~0005030

Ahh okay, yes that does make sense.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2017-04-25 01:18 Adam Edington New Issue
2017-04-25 01:18 Adam Edington File Added: ascending.png
2017-04-25 11:20 Chris Graham Note Added: 0005021
2017-04-25 11:20 Chris Graham Status non-assigned => closed
2017-04-25 11:20 Chris Graham Assigned To => Chris Graham
2017-04-25 11:20 Chris Graham Resolution open => no change required
2017-04-25 23:22 Adam Edington Note Added: 0005022
2017-04-25 23:24 Chris Graham Note Added: 0005023
2017-04-25 23:26 Chris Graham Relationship added related to 0003252
2017-04-25 23:29 Adam Edington Note Added: 0005024
2017-04-25 23:30 Chris Graham Note Added: 0005025
2017-04-25 23:40 Adam Edington Note Added: 0005026
2017-04-25 23:43 Chris Graham Note Added: 0005027
2017-04-25 23:52 Adam Edington Note Added: 0005028
2017-04-25 23:56 Chris Graham Note Added: 0005029
2017-04-26 00:01 Adam Edington Note Added: 0005030