View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0003538Composrcataloguespublic2018-02-23 03:03
ReporterAdam EdingtonAssigned ToChris Graham 
SeverityFeature-request 
Status closedResolutionnot fixable 
Product Version 
Fixed in Version 
Summary0003538: Linked record fields
DescriptionI've been playing around with Airtable lately (https://airtable.com/) and I wondered if Composr Catalogues could provide a similar feature set (perhaps in v11). The ease of linking entries is the thing I find the most useful.
Additional Informationhttps://support.airtable.com/hc/en-us/articles/206452848-Linked-record-fields
TagsNo tags attached.
Time estimation (hours)
Sponsorship open

Relationships

related to 0003542 non-assigned Search and Find Page to Add/Link 

Activities

Chris Graham

2018-02-13 00:01

administrator   ~0005511

This issue is rather vague. I appreciate it, and I'll make a note where we list competing systems, but...

Airtable has over $10.6 million in funding to produce this system.

Essentially this issue is a "make a system as user friendly as Airtable" rather than a specific feature, and we couldn't do it without at least a six-figure investment specifically in that.

Adam Edington

2018-02-13 19:03

administrator   ~0005515

I just meant the way they allow entries to link to other entries, wasn't asking for a full recreation of Airtable.

Chris Graham

2018-02-13 19:04

administrator   ~0005516

Right, but we have entry cross-referencing already.

Adam Edington

2018-02-13 19:12

administrator   ~0005517

Last edited: 2018-02-14 00:22

View 2 revisions

True, but it would be nice to have the search function for entries rather than the tree list (or as well as).

Adam Edington

2018-02-13 19:12

administrator  

seach_records.png (1,106 bytes)
seach_records.png (1,106 bytes)

Adam Edington

2018-02-16 13:29

administrator   ~0005527

I also think that as we have templates for the different views, allowing these to be selected on the frontend (grid view, tabular, etc) would be a nice touch if no default is selected as an override to providing all 4 view options to members.

Chris Graham

2018-02-23 03:03

administrator   ~0005535

That's a nice suggestion.

Mythus suggested something similar re finding records (I linked the issue).

To be clear the only reason this issue was closed is that it just wasn't something clear enough to manage. I am keeping Mythus's issue open as it's pretty specific, and if implemented could be done for all content types.

It is very unlikely this feature would make v11 as we have so many basic UX things to do (e.g. auto-fixing photo orientation as recently discussed, or the major theme upgrading): tackling UX for people with huge amounts of content is much more minority use case. That doesn't mean I don't want it to happen, e.g. in the future or if someone can contribute the code.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2018-02-12 11:08 Adam Edington New Issue
2018-02-13 00:01 Chris Graham Note Added: 0005511
2018-02-13 00:01 Chris Graham Status non-assigned => closed
2018-02-13 00:01 Chris Graham Assigned To => Chris Graham
2018-02-13 00:01 Chris Graham Resolution open => not fixable
2018-02-13 19:03 Adam Edington Note Added: 0005515
2018-02-13 19:04 Chris Graham Note Added: 0005516
2018-02-13 19:12 Adam Edington Note Added: 0005517
2018-02-13 19:12 Adam Edington File Added: seach_records.png
2018-02-14 00:22 Adam Edington Note Edited: 0005517 View Revisions
2018-02-16 13:29 Adam Edington Note Added: 0005527
2018-02-23 02:42 Chris Graham Relationship added related to 0003542
2018-02-23 03:03 Chris Graham Note Added: 0005535