View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0003718 | Composr | catalogues | public | 2018-10-28 12:14 | 2018-10-29 23:53 |
Reporter | Adam Edington | Assigned To | Chris Graham | ||
Severity | Feature-request | ||||
Status | closed | Resolution | won't fix | ||
Product Version | |||||
Fixed in Version | |||||
Summary | 0003718: Codenames being set as Meta tags | ||||
Description | Codenames are being set as Meta tags (despite having no visibility). The Meta tags are broken up halves of the codename (not sure what causes the break). Perhaps codenames should be set to read only when viewing the edit screen or not be shown. Not sure why anyone would want to edit a unique codename. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Time estimation (hours) | |||||
Sponsorship open | 0 | ||||
related to | 0003722 | resolved | Patrick Schmalstig | Don't split up codename fields when scanning for words |
related to | 0003725 | resolved | Patrick Schmalstig | Allow configuring what fields are scanned for possible keywords |
|
If anything's to be done here, it needs to be reopened as separate and more detailed issues, and it would be feature requests. I tested a codename field and it didn't split up. It might if I used a dot in it. The fields aren't treated differently from others - it identifies words. So you might add a feature request to request codename fields do not be split up even if they look like multiple words. All fields are used for keyword fields, regardless of visibility. I think it would be a wrong assumption that keywords should only be drawn from visible fields. A feature request might be considered to determine which fields are scanned for keywords. Codenames being read only would also have to be a separate issue. It would need to be configurable, as it's perfectly normal that someone may want to change a codename. For example, a SKU may have been wrongly input, product codenames may have been changed, or all kinds of things. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2018-10-28 12:14 | Adam Edington | New Issue | |
2018-10-29 23:53 | Chris Graham | Note Added: 0005849 | |
2018-10-29 23:53 | Chris Graham | Status | non-assigned => closed |
2018-10-29 23:53 | Chris Graham | Assigned To | => Chris Graham |
2018-10-29 23:53 | Chris Graham | Resolution | open => won't fix |
2018-10-29 23:55 | Chris Graham | Relationship added | related to 0003722 |
2018-10-30 15:35 | Chris Graham | Relationship added | related to 0003725 |