View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000784 | Composr | search | public | 2012-08-26 22:41 | 2021-04-06 01:29 |
| Reporter | Chris Graham | Assigned To | |||
| Severity | Feature-request | ||||
| Status | non-assigned | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | |||||
| Fixed in Version | |||||
| Summary | 0000784: Better faceted search | ||||
| Description | A way to group (cluster) entries by content type, in tabs. Allow specification of the render mode to show results in (boxes, tabular, etc...). | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Time estimation (hours) | 12 | ||||
| Sponsorship open | |||||
|
|
Also, separate catalogue search checkbox into a checkbox for each individual catalogue. Don't refer to catalogues jargon at all. |
|
|
advanced_search.zip (63,380 bytes) |
|
|
Old 4.3 code attached for a fork we had. Would need a lot of reworking. |
|
|
This came back onto my horizon recently, as I realized that relevance-based searching will do a poor job aggregating different result kinds. It is possible we can extract an explicit relevance value from MySQL and compare that of different queries. But even if we do that, we can't do it when integrating external search systems or our own filesystem-based searching. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-21 15:15 | Chris Graham | File Added: advanced_search.zip | |
| 2016-11-21 15:15 | Chris Graham | Note Added: 0004563 | |
| 2020-01-10 15:17 | Chris Graham | Tag Attached: ocProducts client-work (likely) | |
| 2020-01-10 18:03 | Chris Graham | Note Added: 0006272 | |
| 2021-04-06 01:29 | Chris Graham | Tag Detached: ocProducts client-work (likely) |
